The proposal, often dubbed the Champerty Fix Act, seeks to amend state laws governing the purchase of claims for the purpose of litigation. By applying these restrictions to debt issued or guaranteed by foreign governments, the bill aims to curb the practice of buying distressed debt at a discount to sue for full repayment. It would also cap the interest rates applied to judgments against sovereign borrowers.

Supporters argue the current legal framework drains resources from struggling nations and complicates international debt restructurings. Jose Gonzalez of NY Communities for Change stated that Albany has a unique responsibility to ensure the state’s legal system does not undermine fair debt resolution processes. Because New York law governs more than 50% of global sovereign bonds, the local legislative outcome carries massive implications for international finance.

Opposition remains fierce. Industry groups, including SIFMA and the Creditor Rights Coalition, contend that the changes would erode New York’s standing as a premier global financial hub. Despite the Senate’s approval, the Assembly’s commitment is far from guaranteed. A similar attempt to pass the legislation stalled in the chamber last year. Senator Liz Krueger’s office acknowledged that leadership has yet to confirm a path forward, leaving stakeholders in a high-stakes waiting game as the Albany session nears its end.